Thursday, September 02, 2010
Opportunities for community, discovery & transformation through golf.
Columnists
MENU ITEM VIEW ITEM
 
 
 
YOU WANT A PLAYOFF -- HAVE A PLAYOFF
 
 
Of all the repugnant things that corporate gluttony has done to sport, nothing quite compares to what the FedEx Corporation, in association with Tim Finchem of the PGA, have done to “the greatest gemme” of golf.
 
With the introduction of “The FedEx Cup,” the sport of gentlemen has been reduced to a kind of year-end Chicken Ranch pageant that might as well be called “Dirty Dancing With The Stars” for the sake of the be-all and end-all of American life in the early 21st century -- “television ratings…”
 
I’d go into the Kafka-esque absurdities of a “system” that combines incomprehensible point tallies that result in standings with negative numbers at the end of a season of blood, sweat, and tears, or the crowning of a non-winner in a fashion worthy only of Caligula, but all this has been “covered” by the very process that has delivered this abomination to the grid -- the media and its telephone party-game gossip mongers…
 
Instead, a bit of simple logic, if it might still be permitted.
 
 
 
PLAYOFFS  work in only one situation: when a sport’s season consists of a set number of scheduled games between two opponents at a time, the result of which is a win or a loss, with the W’s and L’s being totaled to produce a simple listing of final standing at the end of that season.
 
The original American pastime of baseball was first to catch on to the possibility of then adding a season ending tournament that would produce an exciting, satisfying denouement to an already completed season, and the resulting “Fall Classic” of the World Series was so successful that other sports soon followed -- especially when mass market television made sporting spectacle into a license to print money -- i.e., “The Super Bowl.”
 
 
 
SO  when you have a sport which consists of two teams playing against each other for a win or a loss, you can have a playoff.
 
But in a sport like golf, where you have hundreds of individuals playing various tours around the globe for tournament prizes of trophy, prestige, and professional level money, there can be no “playoff” at the end of it all that doesn’t contradict or diminish all that comes before it.
 
No matter how many motivated minds apply tunnel vision to systemizing the behavior of cats, you’re never going to get a group of four legged felines into a ring so you can have one final “race” to determine “best cat.”
 
Cats don’t race.
 
And golf is not a team elimination sport.
 
 
 
ALL that said, if you do want to concoct a television spectacle for the sake of pitting gladiators against one another for cold hard cash, and you don’t want to call it what that would be in golf -- a glorified skins game -- then just admit what you’re doing and do it on a simple level that Joe Sixpack can understand (and bet on).
 
4 weeks. Regular 4-round, 4-day format. Stroke play.
 
Week-1:  128 players, seeded by money rankings to reward winning play during the year, No.1 vs No.128, 2 vs 127, and so on.
 
Week-2: 64 players, same format.
 
Week-3: 32 players, same format.
 
And for the final Week-4: 16 players on Day 1, 8 players on Day 2, 4 players on Day 3, and on the final day, just 2 players playing 18 holes, stroke play, for the championship and the loot.
 
You want ratings? Week-4 would produce ratings that golf has never seen -- especially if it was timed to be held the week before the NFL season started…
 
 
 
AND then golf being what it really  is -- which is to say, golfers being who they really are -- you’d end up with yesterday being Tiger vs. Phil, Joe Sixpack screaming and yelling and putting money down all over his living room and Las Vegas, and at the end when the 10-gazillion dollar check was presented to Phil -- as it should have been yesterday -- he probably would have turned around and donated it to breast cancer research so that lovers of “the greatest gemme” everywhere could still look themselves in the eye in the mirror come morning and smile.
 
That, to “the greatest gemme,” would be a “playoff.”
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
________________________________________________________
Richard Lees is on The Board of Directors of The Shivas Irons Society, and President of Richard Lees Capital Management in Los Angeles (
www.RichardLees.com ). STREAMERS attempts to reveal bits and pieces of one golfer's ”fascination.”  As Shivas Irons puts it, “Gowf is a place to practice fascination, and as fascination is practiced, a capacity develops to put forth streamers of heart power for the ball to fly on."
 
 
 
Posted in: Streamers
Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (11) RSS comment feed | Bookmark and Share

Comments

Monday, September 28, 2009 10:34 PM

Comment by: Steve Cohen

Interesting commentary Richard. My response—albeit not quite as strong—is similar about the commercialization and the obscene prize money. At least there has not been much pretense from Finchem that this "playoff" is anything more than a grab for TV ratings and sponsor money. It reflects pretty much what all big time professional sports have become in recent decades...

With the FedEx Cup it's been especially weird and ridiculous that NO ONE in the golf community has had any real understanding of (or at least the ability to explain) the point system. One of the tour pros said... "I don't understand the NASCAR point system but I enjoy watching it." Steve Stricker's bewildered answers about whether he knew where he stood in the competition were pretty enlightening. At least this year the final day gave us some interesting golf to watch... at a great club. Not sure how Finchem convinced Tiger to play in all four playoff events but it did make for some good viewing.

I like your suggestion about simplicity but it will never happen because instead of Tiger/Phil they could end up with less marquis names and a lopsided medal score... I think that they are essentially trying to do what you describe but have made up their incomprehensible point system to guarantee Tiger and other big names are there at the finish.

In spite of all, 'tis the greatest gemme.

Steve

Tuesday, September 29, 2009 7:05 PM

Comment by: Steve Shaffer

I call it the FedUp Cup. Next year there will be further "tweaking" as Tiger found out he really didn't have to play the first 3 events this year. He would have been in the top5 had he skipped these events.

I like the the LPGA's format in the now defunct ADT event: 8 finalists on Sunday and the winner gets most of the money.

Having only 2 finalists, even at stroke play, will not fly with TV as there is a chance that Tiger might not qualify. The TV ratings this year were up because of him as opposed to last year's event when he did not play.

Tuesday, September 29, 2009 8:08 PM

Comment by: STAN GUM

WE ALL KNOW THAT THEY STILL HAVE NOT GOT THE FORMAT RIGHT. I THINK HAVING FOUR EVENTS WITH THE FINAL ONE REDUCING THE FIELD TO 30 TOP PLAYERS WORKS, EXCEPT THEY THEN SHOULD ALL START EVEN FOR THE FINAL EVENT AND THEN THE WINNER WOULD BE THE REAL FEDEX CHAMPION. I THINK TIM FINCHIM WANTS THE TV MONEYFOR THE PGA, BUT ALSO DOES NOT WANT IT TO COMPETE WITH THE MAJORS. HAVING 3 EVENTS IN 3 WEEKS AND THEN A WEEK OFF BEFORE THE FINAL, MAKES A LOT OF SENSE.IF THE BEST PLAYERS DO NOT PLAY WELL IN THE 1ST 3 WEEKS, THEN THEY SHOULD NOT BE IN THE FINAL

Tuesday, September 29, 2009 11:05 PM

Comment by: Kirk Triplett

Actually you would have ended up with KP against Tiger for the big money, if I remember the saturday night leaderboard correctly.

Anybody ever thought of pool play ? (The Olympics, World Cup Soccer, Little League) The last event could be 32 players...I dont care how you get there. It would be 8 pools of 4 players who play each other in one day medal play matches. One point for a win, one-half for a tie. The player with the most points in each pool after his three matches moves on to the final. Ties are broken by total medal score only. The final 8 play 36 holes stroke play for the title. The USA can still beat the Russians...just not very often.

To introduce a little drama to the whole affair I think instead of having the pools be decided by seeding, I would have a draft. The top 8 seeds would be allowed to choose players for their pool or anybody else's pool. Now that is something I would watch on the golf channel.

Wednesday, September 30, 2009 2:27 PM

Comment by: Richard Lees

Absolutely -- that would be "must see GC!" Kind of a cross between the televised NBA draft and the moment all kids remember from grade school when they don't get picked to be on a team...

Thanks for joining the conversation here, Kirk. It's great to hear the thoughts of a tour player -- especially for a group like ours that appreciates deeply what you guys really do and love about "the greatest gemme."

--RL

Wednesday, September 30, 2009 8:45 PM

Comment by: Jenifer McKitrick

It all seemed to get really out of hand for me when the tv commentators were telling us where Tiger would have to place for Phil to win and if Sean was T3 or less and if the other guy finished T8 or less but only if Strick bogied this hole, etc. And it does seem excessive for there to be two trophies at the same time. A true playoff would be great. Thanks for the article.

Thursday, October 01, 2009 10:49 AM

Comment by: Richard Lees

Yeah, Jenifer, that back and forth, if/then layer added on top of the absurdity of calling one competition by two different names -- one of which is "the tour championship" and the other of which is "the year-long championship" -- made the whole thing like an episode of The Colbert Report where Phil wins but Tiger is given the prize because Stephen says the facts are what Stephen says...

It's all endemic of a culture that has ceded "meaning" to "experts" who arrogantly insist that the only thing they need say to "the public" is "trust me, it's under control," only to later reveal that they have been paid to allow corporate gluttony to rename reality for the sake of hollow profit.

My feeling is that because this is so much the antithesis of what "the greatest gemme" is at its center that it's offensive to the lover of golf's traditions, values, and true meaning which so resonates with us as a group dedicated to that meaning.

Thursday, October 01, 2009 11:39 PM

Comment by: Jon Leland

Geez, I'm in the minority here. You guys should try to run something like the PGA Tour sometime. I know that being President of the United States is an even harder job, but it can't be easy to try to please all of the various "masters" necessary to keep it all that organization working, growing and profitable, not to mention pleasing second-guessers like you.

They don't call it the "show" for nothing. And, guys, let's face it: it's TV. Did you just discover that TV ratings determine the commercial viability of TV broadcasts? Your comments about ratings being "the be all and end all" seem absolutely passé. They seem to me like crying over spilt milk that was water under the bridge decades ago. Get over it or just watch YouTube. :)

Personally, I found it fun to watch and I'm happy that Phil could compete and win the Players despite not having a good year in so many ways.

But the "the greatest gemme" is not damaged. My enjoyment is not diluted. Shivas still lives! Just my 2 cents.

Friday, October 02, 2009 10:13 AM

Comment by: Richard Lees

In the "Block That Meta-Fore!" department, Jon, I think we should add a penny for your thoughts of "passe crying over spilt milk that was water under the bridge decades ago..." Makes it 3-sense -- at least.

Friday, October 02, 2009 8:16 PM

Comment by: Jim Diederich

Richard’s comments are thought provoking. It is difficult to escape how artificial the FedEx Cup seems in so many ways.

The sense you get is that by making the prize $10,000,000 we would all have to pay attention, wouldn’t we. But with Tiger making over 10 times that per year and approaching being the first billion dollar athlete it is difficult to get excited about him winning another few million.

And then there are the commercials with the players touting the FedEx Cup. Somehow Padrig’s statement that someday everyone will judge you by how many FedEx Cups you have won just doesn’t strike me as his genuine feelings. He is just too honest to escape betraying in his body language his inner feelings that the Cup may not endure.

What about all of the renaming of stadiums and tournaments? When FedEx runs into financial trouble and bows out as sponsor and it becomes the Google.com Cup it won’t have the ring of Master’s Champion, US Open Champion, Open Champion, or PGA Champion.

This is clearly an example of fitting a square peg into a round hole. If there were anything natural about the FedEx Cup scoring system there wouldn’t be such a struggle trying to find a system that is fair, exciting, clear, and meaningful.

The fall series, where players outside the top 125 try to improve their standing and Q School where players fight to advance their careers have far more integrity than the Cup.

All of that said, I can’t help but come away feeling that I could be standing in the shoes of those who criticized the Eifel Tower when it was built. Certainly the competition of the closing tournaments gives some spice to post PGA Championship season. If we could just tune out all of the hype, the points, and the money.

Tuesday, November 03, 2009 11:24 AM

Comment by: M. Jay Greenberg

The Champions Tour has something similar, the Charles Schwab Cup. I went to see the third round at Sonoma G.C. last Saturday. John Cook was running away with the tournament, so there was no excitement in that competition (though it was inspiring to watch how well John was playing and I got his autograph inside the bill of my Shivas Irons cap afterward).

But there was a second competition going on that was exciting to watch: Bernhard Langer striving to overtake Loren Roberts for the Schwab Cup - Roberts held on and won the million dollar annuity. So as a spectator I appreciated getting to watch two tournaments for the price of one.

I was sitting on the grass right next to the 16th green, a par 5 hole. I watched player after player misjudge the non-existent break on putts from below the hole. After Langer missed such a putt and started walking off the green after tapping in for par, a spectator called out to him "I could have told you it didn't break." Langer replied "I wouldn't have listened to you."

This is the last time the season-ending tournament will be held at Sonoma, unfortunately - it's such a wonderful venue. The event will be played at Harding Park in San Francisco in 2010 and 2011, which we know is also terrific, but the weather is not likely to be as good.

Just a comment about Richard's critique: I agree that the Fed Ex Cup system is absurdly complicated, that hardly anyone can follow it in detail, amd maybe Richard's proposed alternative would have more integrity. But if it gives us the opportunity to watch Tiger and Phil and Padraig et al compete in more tournaments, who cares about "corporate gluttony."

Post Comment

Only registered users may post comments.
Topics
Column Archives
Entries by Author
About these blogs...

Opinions expressed in these Columns are from individual columnists and do not necessarily reflect the policies, beliefs or the values of the Shivas Irons Society.

Blogs are meant to be constructive in nature – mean spirited articles will not be published. Controversial topics may be posted and discussed but please note: The Shivas Irons Society may or may not share the views that are expressed.

We ask that you maintain reasonable and appropriate etiquette regarding the use of language and subject matter.  All entries are subject to the discretion of the Shivas Irons Society personnel. Postings containing improper, offensive language OR subject matter may be removed or edited by the Society without warning.

Please report improper postings HERE.

Opinions expressed in these Columns are from individual columnists and do not necessarily reflect the policies, beliefs or the values of the Shivas Irons Society.

Blogs are meant to be constructive in nature – mean spirited articles will not be published. Controversial topics may be posted and discussed but please note: The Shivas Irons Society may or may not share the views that are expressed.

We ask that you maintain reasonable and appropriate etiquette regarding the use of language and subject matter.  All entries are subject to the discretion of the Shivas Irons Society personnel. Postings containing improper, offensive language OR subject matter may be removed or edited by the Society without warning.

Please report improper postings HERE.

Privacy Statement  |  Terms Of Use   |   Contact Us
Copyright 2010 by the Shivas Irons Society