Saturday, March 13, 2010
Opportunities for community, discovery & transformation through golf.
Columnists

It's the end of the season for many of us, which means that it's time to consider adjustments to your game for next year. Luke points out some cutting edge research and what it suggests you should be focusing on when you swing, and its relevance to your game...

What should you focus on?

Why Awareness, and the Flag, won't work. . .

When I turn on the golf channel, I frequently see some guy screaming at the camera telling me that I need to feel or think about this or that when I am swinging. The question then is, what exactly should you be focused on when you swing? Is there one thing that is better than another? Over the course of 20 years of golf, I've tried a myriad of things: feeling the 'lag', thinking right hand-down, and turn the left shoulder--just to name a few. I've tried being "aware", but got a really bad case of the shanks doing that in a tournament once. I've tried just focusing on the flag, but have had very mixed results. The flag, it seemed, wasn't really related to what I was doing with my club and ball, it was just a marker in space. What if I hit it? (see Hunter Mahan, 2009 US Open). Recent research has shed light on this question, and has relevance for playing at our peak; it all has to do with what we put our "attentional focus" on. In other-words, it's all about what are we focused on when we swing. When I stumbled upon the initial waves of this research a few years ago, the way I played and taught the game dramatically changed for the better. The answer, as to what is the most beneficial thing to focus on for optimal performance in golf, may pleasantly surprise you.  

Essentially, we can boil down where we put our attention into three categories, Internal (how are body is moving when we swing), External nearby, (i.e., the club face at impact), and External far away (i.e., the flight of the ball). According to the latest study in this area of research, referred to as action effect hypothesis, James Bell and James Hardy, scholars at Bangor University, in Wales, UK, decided to explore these areas of attention, with an historically understudied population of golfers: experts. Those with an average handicap of 5. In the past, most research on this subject has been conducted on novice golfers (They are easier to find and study). Bell and Hardy had three groups of golfers, all with with an average handicap of 5.5, hit chip shots to a target about 22 yards away. The first group, had an internal focus: wrist hinge. The second group had an external nearby focus: square club face. The third group had an external far away focus: straight flight. The results were unequivocal. Performance from the third group was significantly more accurate using the far away external focus in comparison to both the external nearby and internal focus groups. Furthermore, when the researchers introduced anxiety heightened conditions (offering $$$$ for accuracy), the results duplicated themselves.

So, why doesn't awareness work? Awareness itself is not bad. In fact, it may be helpful in learning a movement pattern. However, awareness of how the body is moving brings about an internal focus of attention, and as the research has shown over and over again, an internal focus in performance settings is less helpful. Bell and Hardy even go as far as saying that performance is impaired with internal focus, and enhanced with external far away focus. Shanks? Say hello to the cause: internal focus. It's all about letting the mind respond with automaticity. When you go internal, you don't allow this process to take place.

Why is the flag-stick or a target irrelevant? An external focus of attention is one that is directed toward the effect that our body movements have on the environment. I'm not affecting the flag, where as I am affecting how the ball flies, and where it lands on the the green. What you choose to focus on may seem subtle, yet it holds a significant difference in the way things may turn out. I credit this body of research as the biggest influence of improvement in my personal game and teaching, and I'm confident, that when employed correctly, it will benefit your game too.

Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (10) RSS comment feed | Bookmark and Share

Comments

# Steve Cohen
Monday, November 16, 2009 3:31 PM
Interesting commentary on "focus" Luke...

I understand and agree with your conclusion about automaticity... although I did find your distinction between "focus" and "awareness" a bit confusing... It may just be semantics, but for me it is only through an awareness of where your focus (attention) tends to go that will get you to that "letting go" space where maximum performance emerges. My training was in Gestalt Therapy and in gestalt terms one would say that it is through awareness that meaningful change takes place.... There is a difference between choosing (trying) to have external focus and actually achieving it. This is good stuff and worthy of lots more discussion.

Steve Cohen
# Ronald Karns
Monday, November 16, 2009 4:15 PM
I'm glad you clarified the difference between "target" and something I can influence in terms of the external far away focus. This would seem to be consistent with the proponents of visualization, visualization, and more visualization.
# Mark Keating
Tuesday, November 17, 2009 8:03 PM
Luke.... nice piece of business here. I can personally attest to the nonsense of internal focus on a golf course and have vivid memories of some faraway focus that produced outstanding results. I am back on it in the morning....

Do you recall Nicklaus and Norman's eyes going through the sky just prior to takeaway?

How about Duvall and Sorenstam looking to the distance to begin the forward motion?

Could all of this be connected?

Could all of us be connected?

Keep it up.
# Mark Keating
Tuesday, November 17, 2009 9:00 PM
I want to add this..... testimony to Fred Shoemaker's club throwing exercises. What he calls reconnecting to the instincts of motion happens when the eyes and the mind are focused in front.

Wednesday, November 18, 2009 11:26 AM
Yes Mark--I think it is all connected. Again, as to Steve's point, this piece is focused on 'performance'.Aawareness (at least my definition of it), when directed internally has the greatest value in my opinion in 'learning'; although research still gives primacy to an external focus in the learning phase interestingly enough. I'm not convinced though. I cite Chuck Hogan's "law"--when focused on mechanics (internal) don't use a target or effect(external), and when using something external, don't focus on mechanics. . .
Furthermore Steve, I whole-heartedly agree with you that we need to distinguish and further define 'focus' and 'awareness'. Many of my students have different definitions for both.These definitions may be different for all of us. . .Good stuff for conversation!
# Richard Lees
Wednesday, November 18, 2009 4:03 PM
I've had the good fortune of working with a pro named Tracy Reed lately who, IMO, has not only figured out these focus-related issues, but in studying the biomechanics of the swing for 25 years, has also developed a method for teaching how to learn it and do it.

I'm going to be writing about my experience with him shortly over in my Streamers blog here on the site, as it's too long to post here in a comment, but suffice it to say that I think it will seriously interest anyone who is not only dealing with the issues Luke brings up, but with how to get them consistently into their game.

Agree with all -- great discussion, Luke! Hope we can advance it after I get my article on Tracy posted. (He works with guys more like you than me who are either on the tour or trying to get there or have an index below 4... I got lucky when I read and responded deeply to a manual he's written about his research...)

--Richard Lees
Wednesday, November 18, 2009 9:49 PM
Luke,

Thanks for the great article - Q - How does visualizing a shot play into this? Is it the same as the internal command about the external focus?

eg) draw flight to middle of green (mental image of ball drawing to middle of green)

What you discuss above created a very positive transition in my game this season - ie) focusing on "feel" of the shot and where I wanted to fly and land - especially with chipping. It has been quite amazing to let my "body" do its own thing during the swing with an external mental thought beforehand.

I haven't made any hole in ones using the "burn the flag with your eyes" approach . . . very interesting how this tends to work.

Chapeau!
# Granville Harper
Tuesday, November 24, 2009 5:39 PM
Great discussion!

I've (almost) always (Fred Shoemaker being the exception) been told to focus on the "target." Just like a basketball player, dart thrower, et.cet. And, just like throwing a wad of paper into a waste basket. Maybe the difference is that we don't have the golf ball in our hands?

Granny
# Richard Lees
Tuesday, November 24, 2009 7:13 PM
Hey, Granville, I think you're absolutely right, the difference with golf IS that we don't have contact with the ball in our hands. I brought this up to Fred and Bill C. at one of the ExtraGolf sessions you and I attended, in fact, and as I recall, it elicited a smile. And I think that's appropriate, and why golf remains the "greatest gemme."

In golf, as in life, the only time we "have the ball in hand" is when we're "teeing up our intentions" or lifting our "result from the hole." Other sports allow you to have "hands on," if only for brief bursts, but always with an opponent ready to respond to whatever you do with it.

For golf, we invent tools and refine them and then invent them again -- all for the purpose of getting that "untouchable ball" "in the hole." The duality between desire and reach can never be completely resolved. We develop a quality that we call "touch," which attempts to bridge the gap via tools, but the gap is never fully bridged.

The ball to the hole, in Michael Murphy's wonderful phrase -- one of my favorites actually -- is ultimately "the alone in search of the alone."

And no amount of "focus" is ever going to change that. As we found out over the summer, in fact, with Watson on hole 72 of The Open, even the ball that is on its way to "completing the round," providing victory, triumphing against the odds, "closing the circle" in a rare break of the natural order of things is still on its own once launched -- and it can take "a bad bounce." Again, c'est le vie...

One late night in a Shivas-type discussion "in the study" here at my place a friend posited that there is another sport that is similar to golf in that it's just you and the ball and the laws of Nature: the shot-put.

We thought about it a long time, but the only thing we could come up with was that the shot-put is a little TOO Nordic and therefore Sisyphus-like... It's the Scots who got it just right...



--Richard
# Mike Allison
Saturday, March 06, 2010 10:46 PM
Another option would be our old zen friend "only don't know" aka "let the nothingness into your shots". A clear mind works sometimes for me although it is more of a challenge than other swing thoughts. To "not think" after any checklists and calculations and to "not expect" any result is kind of the "zone" for me. When I am able to do this and then not judge my shot but just calmly and detachedly witness the outcome it seems to bring real peace and enjoyment (and usually better results) to my game. Free your thoughts and the rest will follow. I wish I could remember who said "If you will sit still the universe will roll in ecstacy at your feet".

Post Comment

Only registered users may post comments.
Columns
Column Archives
About these blogs...

Opinions expressed in these Columns are from individual columnists and do not necessarily reflect the policies, beliefs or the values of the Shivas Irons Society.

Blogs are meant to be constructive in nature – mean spirited articles will not be published. Controversial topics may be posted and discussed but please note: The Shivas Irons Society may or may not share the views that are expressed.

We ask that you maintain reasonable and appropriate etiquette regarding the use of language and subject matter.  All entries are subject to the discretion of the Shivas Irons Society personnel. Postings containing improper, offensive language OR subject matter may be removed or edited by the Society without warning.

Please report improper postings HERE.

 
Bookmark and Share

Privacy Statement  |  Terms Of Use   |   Contact Us
Copyright 2010 by the Shivas Irons Society